CVE-2026-16317: Missing validation of the outer content_type byte on TLS 1.3 encrypted records in s2n-tls allows an active man-in-the-middle to silently discard individual application data records
Missing validation of the outer content_type byte on TLS 1.3 encrypted records in s2n-tls allows an active man-in-the-middle to silently discard individual application data records without either endpoint detecting the modification. RFC 8446 Section 5.2 requires that the outer content_type of all encrypted TLS 1.3 records must be application_data (0x17). The s2n-tls AEAD implementation hardcodes this value in the additional authenticated data rather than using the actual wire byte, so the outer content_type is not covered by the authentication tag.
This enables selective suppression of application data. In HTTP pipelining scenarios, dropping a TLS record containing an HTTP request can cause request/response desynchronization, where subsequent responses are delivered to the wrong requests. In write-heavy workloads, a dropped record containing a write request can result in undetectable data loss when the client interprets a subsequent success response as confirmation of the dropped write.
All TLS 1.3 connections are affected. Both TLS clients and servers are affected. TLS 1.2 and QUIC connections are not affected.
We recommend you upgrade s2n-tls to version v1.7.6
Details
Original advisory: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-16317
Exploitation outlook
EPSS (FIRST.org) estimates each CVE’s probability of exploitation in the next 30 days — here is the CSIRTS.com read on those numbers.
- Low exploitation riskCVE-2026-163170.19% 30-day exploitation probability — currently an unlikely target, but scores change as exploit code circulates. Riskier than 8% of all scored CVEs.
Referenced CVEs
| CVE | CSIRTS overview | External |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-16317 | coverage & exploitation status | NVD · CVE.org |
Same CVEs, other sources
How other CERTs, PSIRTs and databases cover the vulnerabilities in this advisory.
Recent advisories for Missing validation of
A cluster of recent advisories against the same product widens the attack surface — attackers routinely chain freshly published CVEs on one product, so review these together.
- mediumCVE-2025-14469: The Theme Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versi…nvd · 2026-08-01
- criticalCVE-2026-60112: AMMOS Instrument Toolkit (AIT) GUI before 2.5.1 contains a missing authentication vulnerabilit…nvd · 2026-07-29
- mediumCVE-2026-53667: React Router is a router for React. In versions 7.11.0 through 7.17.0, the RSCErrorHandler is …nvd · 2026-07-27
- mediumGHSA-q3g2-m552-3r9c: swift-nio-http2: Missing CR/LF/NUL validation in header valuesghsa · 2026-07-24
- mediumCVE-2026-64785: SwiftNIO HTTP/2 was missing validation on inbound HEADERS frames that let CR, LF, NUL, SP and …nvd · 2026-07-23
- mediumGHSA-h8fp-f39c-q6mh: React Router: RSCErrorHandler Missing Protocol Validation (XSS)ghsa · 2026-07-23
More from NVD Recent CVEs
- mediumCVE-2026-12231: The Exclusive Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scr…2026-08-02
- mediumCVE-2026-18573: A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which is used for managing au…2026-08-02
- mediumCVE-2026-18572: Keycloak provides authorization services that allow administrators to restrict access to resou…2026-08-02
- mediumCVE-2026-18571: A flaw was found in the user creation component of Keycloak when Fine-Grained Admin Permission…2026-08-02
- mediumCVE-2026-18570: A flaw was found in the full-scope-disabled client-policy executor within the keycloak-service…2026-08-02