GHSA-gcfq-8gqf-4876: GoFiber Vulnerable to X-Real-IP Spoofing via Header.Add() in BalancerForward
Summary
The BalancerForward proxy helper in GoFiber uses Header.Add() instead of Header.Set() when injecting the X-Real-IP header. This appends the real client IP as a second header value rather than replacing any attacker-supplied value. Upstream servers that read the first X-Real-IP header (nginx, Express, most HTTP servers) use the attacker's spoofed IP for logging, rate limiting, and access control.
Vulnerable Code
File: middleware/proxy/proxy.go, lines 270-285
func BalancerForward(servers []string, clients ...*fasthttp.Client) fiber.Handler {
r := &roundrobin{
current: 0,
pool: servers,
}
return func(c fiber.Ctx) error {
server := r.get()
if !strings.HasPrefix(server, "http") {
server = "http://" + server
}
c.Request().Header.Add("X-Real-IP", c.IP()) // line 282: Add, not Set
return Do(c, server+c.OriginalURL(), clients...)
}
}
Data Flow
1. Attacker sends request with X-Real-IP: 10.0.0.1 (spoofed internal IP)
2. BalancerForward handler executes at line 282
3. c.Request().Header.Add("X-Real-IP", c.IP()) APPENDS the real IP as a second header
4. Upstream server receives: X-Real-IP: 10.0.0.1 AND X-Real-IP: <real-attacker-ip>
5. Most HTTP servers (nginx, Node.js, Apache) read the FIRST value
6. Upstream uses 10.0.0.1 for all IP-dependent logic
Impact
- Rate limit bypass: IP-based rate limiting at the upstream uses the spoofed IP, allowing unlimited requests
- IP ACL bypass: Internal IP allowlists (e.g., admin panels restricted to 10.0.0.0/8) can be bypassed
- Audit log poisoning: Security logs record the spoofed IP, making incident investigation unreliable
- Geolocation bypass: IP-based geofencing or region restrictions are circumvented
Fix
Replace Header.Add() with Header.Set() at line 282:
c.Request().Header.Set("X-Real-IP", c.IP())
Header.Set() replaces any existing header value, ensuring only the real client IP is forwarded.
Details
Original advisory: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-gcfq-8gqf-4876
Exploitation outlook
EPSS (FIRST.org) estimates each CVE’s probability of exploitation in the next 30 days — here is the CSIRTS.com read on those numbers.
- Low exploitation riskCVE-2026-450450.36% 30-day exploitation probability — currently an unlikely target, but scores change as exploit code circulates. Riskier than 29% of all scored CVEs.
Referenced CVEs
| CVE | CSIRTS overview | External |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-45045 | coverage & exploitation status | NVD · CVE.org |
Same CVEs, other sources
How other CERTs, PSIRTs and databases cover the vulnerabilities in this advisory.
More from GitHub Security Advisories
- mediumGHSA-xm43-3m56-w3wf: Ghost: Paid gift memberships obtainable at minimal cost via the donations feature2026-08-04
- mediumGHSA-chgm-3698-jm42: Ghost: Member existence leak via magic link sign-in response2026-08-04
- highGHSA-xpp7-93x6-v29m: XSS in Ghost's ActivityPub client2026-08-04
- mediumGHSA-7mpp-r37j-x5wh: Ghost: Session Fixation in Ghost Admin2026-08-04
- mediumGHSA-cjc9-q5gf-327p: Ghost: Theme Upload Path Traversal2026-08-04