GHSA-q8gq-377p-jq3r: vLLM: Security Check Bypass via assert Statement in Activation Function Loading Allows Arbitrary Code Execution
Summary
An assert-based security check in vLLM's activation function loading allows any unauthenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution on the server by publishing a malicious HuggingFace model, when vLLM runs in Python optimized mode (python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1).
Details
vLLM uses an assert statement at vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/activations.py:48 as its sole security control to restrict which activation functions can be loaded from a HuggingFace model's config.json:
vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/activations.py:35-53
function_name: str | None = None
if (
hasattr(config, "sentence_transformers")
and "activation_fn" in config.sentence_transformers
):
function_name = config.sentence_transformers["activation_fn"]
elif (
hasattr(config, "sbert_ce_default_activation_function")
and config.sbert_ce_default_activation_function is not None
):
function_name = config.sbert_ce_default_activation_function
if function_name is not None:
assert function_name.startswith("torch.nn.modules."), (
"Loading of activation functions is restricted to "
"torch.nn.modules for security reasons"
)
fn = resolve_obj_by_qualname(function_name)()
Python's assert statements are stripped at compile time when running in optimized mode (python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1). When the assert is absent, the attacker-controlled function_name from the model's config.json is passed directly to resolve_obj_by_qualname() — an unrestricted import gadget:
def resolve_obj_by_qualname(qualname: str) -> Any:
module_name, obj_name = qualname.rsplit(".", 1)
module = importlib.import_module(module_name)
return getattr(module, obj_name)
This is the same vulnerability class as CVE-2017-1000433 (pysaml2 assert-based auth bypass), flagged by Bandit B101 and Ruff S101, and the reason Django proactively replaced all assert-based security checks (ticket #32508).
Attacker-controlled input sources:
- config.sentence_transformers["activation_fn"] (line 40)
- config.sbert_ce_default_activation_funct
Details
Original advisory: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q8gq-377p-jq3r
Exploitation outlook
EPSS (FIRST.org) estimates each CVE’s probability of exploitation in the next 30 days — here is the CSIRTS.com read on those numbers.
- Low exploitation riskCVE-2026-415230.75% 30-day exploitation probability — currently an unlikely target, but scores change as exploit code circulates. Riskier than 51% of all scored CVEs.
Referenced CVEs
| CVE | CSIRTS overview | External |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-41523 | coverage & exploitation status | NVD · CVE.org |
Same CVEs, other sources
How other CERTs, PSIRTs and databases cover the vulnerabilities in this advisory.
- medium[UPDATE] [medium] vllm: Vulnerability allows code executioncert-bund
More from GitHub Security Advisories
- mediumGHSA-xm43-3m56-w3wf: Ghost: Paid gift memberships obtainable at minimal cost via the donations feature2026-08-04
- mediumGHSA-chgm-3698-jm42: Ghost: Member existence leak via magic link sign-in response2026-08-04
- highGHSA-xpp7-93x6-v29m: XSS in Ghost's ActivityPub client2026-08-04
- mediumGHSA-7mpp-r37j-x5wh: Ghost: Session Fixation in Ghost Admin2026-08-04
- mediumGHSA-cjc9-q5gf-327p: Ghost: Theme Upload Path Traversal2026-08-04