CSIRTS // UNIFIED SECURITY ADVISORY FEEDSYS ● ONLINE · POWERED BY INTELFUSIONS.COM

CVE-2026-64273

highCVSS 7.1covered by 2 sourcesfirst seen 2026-07-14
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index iforce_process_packet() handles a status report (packet id 0x02) by taking a force-feedback effect index straight from the device wire and using it to address the per-effect state array: i = data[1] & 0x7f; if (data[1] & 0x80) { if (!test_and_set_bit(FF_CORE_IS_PLAYED, iforce->core_effects[i].flags)) ... } else if (test_and_clear_bit(FF_CORE_IS_PLAYED, iforce->core_effects[i].flags)) { ... } The index is masked only with 0x7f, so it ranges 0..127, but core_effects[] holds only IFORCE_EFFECTS_MAX (32) entries. For an index of 32..127 the test_and_set_bit()/test_and_clear_bit() is an out-of-bounds single-bit read-modify-write past the array. core_effects[] is the second-to-last member of struct iforce, so the write lands in the trailing members and beyond the embedding kzalloc()'d iforce_serio / iforce_usb object. data[1] is unvalidated device payload on both transports (the USB interrupt endpoint and serio), and the status path is not gated on force feedback being present, so a malicious or counterfeit device can set or clear a bit at an attacker-chosen offset past the object. Reject an out-of-range index instead of indexing with it. Bound against the array dimension IFORCE_EFFECTS_MAX rather than dev->ff->max_effects so the check guarantees memory safety regardless of how many effects the device registered. A legitimate "effect started/stopped" status always carries an index below IFORCE_EFFECTS_MAX, so well-formed devices are unaffected; the neighbouring mark_core_as_ready() loop is already bounded and is left untouched.

CSIRTS triage

Other
What
The device-reported force-feedback effect index needs to be bounded in the iforce input driver.
Who is affected
Deployments using the iforce input driver.
Urgency
Remediation urgency is unclear due to unknown severity and no exploitation reported.
Action
Monitor for updates regarding this issue.

AI-assisted analysis generated from the source advisory — verify against the original.

⚡ Watch CVE-2026-64273

Get an email if CVE-2026-64273 is added to CISA KEV, gains public exploit code, or a new advisory cites it — max one per day, one-click unsubscribe.

Exploitation outlook

Advisory coverage (2)

External references

NVD record for CVE-2026-64273

CVE.org record

Embed the live status

CVE-2026-64273 live status badge — this badge updates automatically when the KEV or exploit status changes. How to embed it →

[![CVE-2026-64273 status](https://www.csirts.com/badge/CVE-2026-64273)](https://www.csirts.com/cve/CVE-2026-64273)